Monday, April 9, 2012

Writing, a form of masochistic insanity - considered in two parts



Barking mad. Yes, that’s it, we must be. Insane masochists. Uh-huh. There can be no question about it.

I know, I know. What, you’re wondering, am I on about this time.

Well, simply put, it’s this: I’ve come to the conclusion, after multiple conversations with “pre-published” (read “wannabe”) authors and published authors, that we are all bonkers. Yes, don’t look so aghast, you know it’s true. We are probably certifiable. Go on, feel free to tattoo “out to lunch” on your forehead. It could become the Next Big Thing

If I consider the pain, the agony, the suffering, the loneliness, the setbacks, the uncertainty, the insecurity, the rejections, the blows to confidence and self belief, the cuts in advances, the dropped deals, the cancelled contracts etcetera, etcetera that writers and authors experience, then I have to wonder what sort of sane and rational person would and could want to endure this? Um…give me a moment while I think about this. Oh, yes, right: NONE! Honestly, no person in their rational mind would tolerate or even entertain the setbacks that writers (and other artists) doggedly endure with determination and perseverance in the hope of getting a deal/the next deal. Anyone of sound mind would say “Sod this for a game of soldiers, it’s too much like hard work, it hurts too much, there’s no money in it, I can’t stand the constant blows to my ego, I’m off to become a human rights lawyer/brain surgeon/rocket scientist/accountant.” But do we say this? No, we don’t. We weep into our hot chocolate, we flail on the floor, we sob on each others’ shoulders, we crumple up into balls of despair and dejection and depression – and then we pick ourselves up and put ourselves through the same thing all over again. It’s madness. It must be. It can’t conceivably be anything else.

This lark we writers have of saying, “We write because we must, because we can’t do otherwise,” is a load of old baloney. And yes, mea culpa, I stand accused along with the rest of my writer pals. But the thing is… We make choices. We CHOOSE to write. We CHOOSE to pursue the dream of getting published and then getting published again. They say, (whoever the hell they are) that perseverance is key to success. It strikes me it is also key to insanity. I mean why do we constantly put ourselves through this? Is it that we are driven by frenzied and terminally insane egos? Surely it must be, or why else do we do it? Fame? Not bloody likely. Fortune? Even less bloody likely. To change the world? Forgive me while I fall about laughing. You think you know? Alright then, answers on a postcard, please – or in the comments section of this post.

But levity aside for a moment while I put on my serious hat.




One doesn’t want to be so dramatic as to say what many writers experience in the quest to be published is akin to having one’s soul ripped out, but given we put a piece of our soul into everything we write, one may as well. So it’s probably no small wonder then that an increasing number of clearly less crazy authors are trying to take back their power by self-publishing or e-publishing existing books now out of print. In many ways, we may perhaps be lucky that times are changing, but it will be up to us to help drive that change. And I think, given the scenario in the publishing industry per se, this may be no bad thing.

Aside from lamenting the difficulty of trying to get published with so many of my pals who are in the same boat as I am, there is also, increasingly, a flip side to this coin - and that’s the lot experienced by many published authors of my acquaintance. Authors, who despite working with a particular publisher for years, or having signed a two or three book deal, get dropped by those publishers for no apparent good reason. It goes on to beg several questions about why writers get treated this way. While we may not put up the financial backing, the creative endeavour is primarily all ours, as is an increasing amount of the marketing and publicity. To make it, we have to work hard at what we do, blood, sweat and tears oftentimes, and many, many hours of time are involved. And yet we are treated like puppets. Why do we even allow it? (That rampant insanity again, I suspect.)

Don’t get me wrong here, I’m not blaming publishers. In fact, I entirely understand the publisher’s position; I worked in the corporate world for long enough to be able to see both sides. Business is about creating shareholder value. It’s about return on investment, cashflow and projections. To ensure the best returns one needs to be strategically driven and focused. Usually, that involves taking a long term view in one’s product lines, and conducting ongoing and astute market research that not only predicts market needs now, but also in the future.

What does alarm me, however, is an industry, which according to recent articles, is more interested in debut authors than established authors. Surely there should be some sort of balance? Instead there appears to be an alarming trend out there. New authors are getting lots of chances. (Yes, I know, YAY!!!) Trouble is, if those authors don’t make the bestseller lists or garner awards with Book One, they’re tossed on the scrap heap of also-rans. Meanwhile, established authors are cast aside to make room for the next Hot New Thing. It begs the question: what sort of logic, what market research, what long term strategy is driving this? Is there actually any or has it come down to rank opportunism focused primarily on the moment? I would genuinely like to know, and to understand, because it begs a second question, how does this approach make good long term business sense? Repeat business, a focus on existing successful product lines together with new innovations and constant market awareness are what create success. Or… Are publishers also perhaps going bonkers given the rapidly changing environment in which they find themselves?

Either way, and with no real answers (until you kindly respond in the comments section), it strikes me quite forcibly that this lark of writing is quite simply mad. Yes. Mad, insane and deranged!

Am I going to stop? Oh pul-lease, what a question, or, in any event, not just yet. Do I look like a rocket scientist or a brain surgeon to you? Now pass me that gnawed pencil please, get me some chocolate and then shut the door behind you.


You may also want to take a read of Maureen Lynas’ excellent post, How Big is Your Slushpile, offering a different and altogether more humourous approach on the subject of writerly endurance.




". . .the path of the personal calling is no easier than any other path, except that our whole heart is in this journey."
Paulo Coehlo, The Alchemist

12 comments:

Maureen Lynas said...

Thanks for the plug, Nicky! Please can I be the genius and not the nut? I've been the nut. It's hard.

Mariam Vossough said...

I can't help thinking that this (excellent) post is in part inspired by me! Yours insanely, Mariam.

Ness Harbour said...

Brilliant post Nicky. Oh dear, I can recognise myself throughout....am just off to get my tattoo

Jackie Marchant said...

Yep. We're all bonkers.

Jan Markley said...

'Persistence is the key to insanity' love it! I'm very persistent ... guess that makes me a little bit of an insane writer...!

Carmel Waldron said...

Yup - that just about sums it up Nicky except that I suspect we do it just to see if we can...does that make us more or less mad I wonder?

Nicky Schmidt said...

Maureen, I fear you may be the nut tree at this point... >;-)

Dear Insane Mariam, thank you for the inspiration... :-)

Do remember to post a pic of the tattoo somewhere, Ness!

Stark raving mad, Jackie, unquestionably!

Just a "little bit", Jan...? >;-)

Definitely more mad, Carmel! :-)

Amanda Lillywhite said...

You make some very good points about the publishing business and also about the emerging e-book market. It will be interesting to see how/whether existing publishing houses can adapt to the changes that may be forced upon them. They have been in a position of power for a very long time and, to a large extent, have been dictating publishing and therefore reading trends by being the gatekeepers. But now we can dip into the e-book market and find a great variety of genres and storytelling styles. New and experimental authors can find an audience and readers can expand their range.
And I think you are right that there appears to be a new business model for publishing which seems a bit panicky - is it sustainable? Hmmm.

Mark Jones said...

But it is such good fun, making up whole worlds to destroy. Though your post probably explains why I listen to this song a lot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qrdpliMfoAM

JaneA said...

I think it might be easier for illustrators. Of course we strive for the 'big book deal' as well, but can often pick up other smaller jobs for published work along the way. But that doesn't mean we're any less insane! I loved your post!

Candy Gourlay said...

Mad. Absolutely. But can you help it? Nah. Keep on writing.

Nicky Schmidt said...

Amanda, I think times of change are always interesting and exciting - and nerve-wracking for all concerned. But change is a constant we can always rely on. It will be intriguing to see how things develop. I think the one thing we can rely on is that story will always be there, but the form that story takes always changes.

Mark let me know if and when you find your mind... :-)

Ah, Jane, I think a degree of insanity is prerequisite to all creative endeavours! :-)

Candy, the question really is, would we want to be sane? Nah, sanity is over-rated!