South Africa has spent the past week reeling from the spectacular own goal scored by the government when it refused a visa to the Dalai Lama to attend a peace conference. The Dalai Lama was evidently due to speak at the conference on the role that soccer could play in tackling xenophobia and racism. The government initially said the reason the visa was denied was because they didn’t want the Dalai Lama’s visit drawing attention away from the 2010 World Cup. However, it seems that it was pressure from the Chinese that inclined the government to deny the Dalai Lama access to the country.
There are a few things that have struck me in thinking about the matter.
Rather worryingly, South Africa’s leaders and some of her people, seem to have forgotten our own long struggle for freedom and democracy. It seems to be a case of, “Now that we’re sorted, tough luck for those who aren’t - not our problem.” This conveniently forgets the international aid and support we had from so many quarters. And it forgets how much of that support came from international sporting bodies.
The decision by the government is nothing more than rank hypocrisy hiding behind the skirts of “economics”. Moreover, it is a decision laced with self-centredness and shows absolutely no consideration for the fact that we are all in this together, as one. It is one world, we are one people - what happens to one, impacts upon the other. Tragically, however, it seems our greed and fear are always too strong for us to remember that. History faced with self interest appears to teach us little.
Sadly, money is once again allowed to speak louder than what is right and just. But this whole business of trade vs human struggle is a double edged sword - given that trade with China has resulted in the loss of innumerable jobs in the clothing, textile and footwear industries in South Africa. While consumers have, to date, been happy to buy Chinese made goods, trade unions and workers have long protested against Chinese imports. And of course, it is not only these industries that have been affected – many others have taken a knock at the hands of cheaply made Chinese goods. It would do well for the government and for those South Africans who support the denial of a visa to the Dalai Lama to remember that.
But the Chinese link raises another issue. Not only has the government failed to consider the often brutal reality of the Chinese occupation of Tibet and our own history and struggle for freedom from the apartheid past but they’ve also forgotten our colonial heritage. In a moment of greed and myopia they fail to observe the role that China is increasingly playing in Africa. If anyone was upset by British colonialism, be sure that it will be a tea party by comparison to Chinese colonization, which is already well under way.
The point might even lead one to ask why Mbeki followed such very quiet diplomacy with Zimbabwe. Was it perhaps because Mugabe had already sold out to the Chinese, thereby giving them a kind of ownership in the country, which enabled them to bring economic pressure to bear on the Mbeki government?
But the most critical point remains this: Trade is all well and good but what happened to ethics and human values? Since when did trade become more important than freedom, justice and democracy - the very pillars on which the constitution of South Africa stands? It is a sad day indeed when one’s own leaders forget these things – and it’s no small wonder that several groups are going to the court over the matter.
The self-interested focus on trade at all costs is a sad indictment of what South Africa – that place that once stood as a beacon for human rights - is becoming. It strikes me that those who support the government’s decision are probably also those who last year took to the streets of South Africa in waves of xenophobic violence against refugees from neighbouring countries – countries that had aided those who sought to end apartheid. It all speaks to the same mindset. And it leaves me thinking that too many South Africans (and too many humans per se – witness the global economy) have become far too focused on self interest - to the extent that the view of the far bigger picture of our humanity has been lost. It is a sad day when the South African concept of ubuntu - the ethical and humanist philosophy which focuses on people's allegiances and relations with each other and which acknowledges that we cannot and do not exist in isolation - is forgotten.
The reality of the thing is that the denial of a visa to the Dalai Lama has nothing to do with soccer. It certainly has nothing to do with peace. It definitely has nothing to do with democracy. It would seem to be about something far more complex. Time to wake up and smell the chop-suey wafting through the plastic bead-curtains of self-interest.
28 comments:
Nicky, as usual, you are helping us focus on the important role of government in promoting freedom and welfare for its citizens. Thank you for the information. I can't believe that this is not reported more widely and that people are not shouting out. Perhaps we ought to come up with a communication strategy to wake up the blogging community. Help us design some steps to put the right pressure.
av: glad you talked about this. And glad you widened the issue to include the "second scramble for Africa". It's something that's been fairly widely reported over here (at least in those magazines where journalists are still welcome to investigate behind the official press releases).
The sad truth is that China is becoming everybody's banker - and who argues with the loan officer who can pull the plug on your mortgage?
Which is why it's important that the many among us who still experience indignation speak out when we feel the need to do so.
(On a more personal note, I hope your house is livable again ?)
best to you and yours.
Lakeviewer, it strikes me continuously that we live in an age gone mad. But then, perhaps it has always been so. Perhaps, as D says, we saw a brief window of 15 years when the world seemed to lean into and embrace democracy, openness and cooperation and yet now it looks like we're just returning to the same old familiar madness.
You know, one of the problems with wanting to wake up the blogging community is the same as waking up any community - not everyone wants to be woken up, for some, staying asleep is the "safer" option.
That said, there are several groups out there that do attempt, on an annual basis usually, to really get bloggers talking and thinking. They are the ones trying to make the difference - the problem always lies in sustaining the thing. But I'll have a ponder and will mail you if anything strikes me.
I don't think that one can talk about this thing without drawing in the recolonization of Africa, RLB - yet, I am surprised how few have made the connection. Again, perhaps editors are saying, "tread gently".
The sad truth is that we all look to the here and now and seldom consider the future, as though it's not our problem - and therein lies the "success" and failure of the global economy, and China's rise to dominance.
Yes, thank, the house is fine and absolutely okay for living in - the problems are all outside, but I'm still trying to find someone to fix up the multiple messes left by the painters. Sigh.
I have just reveiwed many of your pictures and I am blown away with the beautiful and composition of the many varied scenes and subjects. Great job, keep shooting!
AV a very thoughtful post and a little daunting at 6:19am. China has always been the sleeping dragon and we knew that it's influence on world economies would be huge eventually but politically is where we need to draw the line. Banning the Dalai Lama seemed to me a rather childish response that won't win many friends for SA. We have very strong ties with China even our PM speaks Mandarin and is eager to give them a bigger table at the IMF but the Lama is a regular visitor here and there seems to have been no problem with that.
China's cheap labour and huge manufacturing potential has also seen many Australian businesses go offshore, the latest is Bonds, leaving 1500 people out of work. But if we place duties on Chinese imports, they may be less likely to buy our minerals and at the moment, that's what's propping up our economy - trade with China. Short sighted in my view, what happens when China has finally modernised . . where does our income come from then? Avaaz is pretty good at keeping an eye on Chinese influences in Africa, remember the arms ship? I never did find out whether the weapons infiltrated Zimbabwe.
AV the US and China are carving up the world between them. While America has gone chasing the oil, China is looking for mineral resources and the ability to grow food. When the West ignored Africa China offered cash to build up economies and prop up dictators. It's probably cost them a lot less than the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost us. The result - the continent of Africa is becoming China's bitch.
I heard a Kenyan minister talking on the BBC news about the importance of China and Chinese investment in Africa to the financial growth of countries that would otherwise be too broke to be of any influence on the world political stage. His claim was that the West kept Africa poor on purpose whereas the Chinese are willing to support Africa achieving economic freedom from debt.
Two things struck me about this 1) how short-sighted it is to offer up deals to a country with an horrendous record on human rights abuses. Did they not ask "where's the catch?" or were they too busy saying "show me the money"? And 2) How short-sighted of the West to ignore the potential that the continent of Africa had to offer the global economy.
Empire building used to be all about the might of armies but now it seems that countries are willing to enslave themselves for money. You know Ireland invited the Normans in in the 12th Century. Warring clans swore allegiance to Norman Knights who helped them to defeat old enemies. Except then they stayed and 800 years of wars followed.
And so the great chinese empire spreads across the globe. Offering up cash as enticements but forgetting to tell those countries that they hook on the line that they are "Property of PRC" now.
AV - I had seen headlines about this, but not much detail.
Thanks for you insightful post.
Excellent post Nicky, really gets to the heart of the problem.
I do not claim to know the bible at all, but isn't it written in there somewhere that the men from the east will take over the world?
xx
Nicky, this is your name, I just learned it from Rosaria and Mandy.
Thank you for this very important post. I'm apalled at how the media is not covering the Dalai Lama issue as it should. I agree with your insightful view, there is a lot more to this than what we're told. And I side with Rosaria, there must be something we can do to shake the blogging community (and any other level of community, obviously) out of this TV-induced stupor, this apathy. We are brainwahed daily to forget about our right to freedom ad well-being. Our dignity as citizens is nullified. Thank you for shaking us from this slumber with your wonderful post. Grazie
hear hear! very well said...
It seems a bit silly to deny entry to the Dalai Lama, even under pressure from China. I thought the standard procedure was to allow him to go where he likes, but to deny him any sort of official access to governments.
In Canada they've denied entry to a British MP, George Galloway, on legal grounds ("giving material support to a terrorist organization"), although his proponents choose to see it as a free speech issue.
If the Dalai Lama hasn't violated any South African laws, then he should be able to come and go the same as any other tourist.
I had been blind to this until i read it here..its always been about colonization isn't it, people are never satisfied with the power they possess and they want more..people dont like equilibrium, they want to excitement..sad and ironic isn't it
It's frightening how they can deny him without any legal reasoning behind it at all. Their excuse was so thin, it's as if they have no worry about how transparent this is to the citizens or foreign relations.
When i first learned about Ubuntu~a person becoming a person only through another, Desmond Tutu spoke about it with love and pride. It reminded me of the Aloha Spirit that the Hawaiian people have, the welcoming,loving,seeing beyond all differences.We are one. I thought that's what Ubuntu was. Mr. Tutu must be very sad these days.
a sceptical side of me is thinking that trade has long been more important than freedom, justice and democracy - at least, for many and very often for those with power.
I've read recently about colonization of parts of Africa by other countries as well, some eastern european.
I find it hard not to be sceptical, to be honest
and yet i do have great faith in human nature, in the majority of cases
so where does it all go wrong?
Ah, the 2010 World Cup, don't let it get like Argentina 78. Any literature you can read on that will scare you senseless...by the time you get to the bit where the slums are bulldozed and repainted with smily faces...
Vanilla, I didn't know about the Dalai Lama, but I feel very strongly about the Chinese and about what's happening in the world economy because of greed and irresponsibility. Thank you for a post that voices my concerns too.
xoxoxo
Yes, this is a mindblowing piece of craziness in a crazy world... On a happier note, I loved all your holiday pics - what an idyllic time you had. Beautiful beaches, sunsets, oceanscapes, and the most amazing fungi, too! Sorry you came back to some crazy stuff back home, though! :)
A sobering and eloquent post, Nicky, thank you. It is horrifying to read that a staggering 750,000 Chinese have settled in Africa over the past decade and apparently more are on the way. China has, it seems, seized a vice-like grip on the continent and is plundering all its assets with a ferocity which is deeply alarming. From Nigeria to Equatorial Guinea, to Gabon and Angola in the west, across Chad and Sudan and south through Zambia, Zimbabwe and Mozambique, that starry red flag flies brazenly.
it is all very sad.
the world is truly unjust. as you said as well, memories are short.
i have often been a glass half full kinda girl, but at times the behaviour of governments feels like a political slap to the glass, spilling alot of the contents.
thank you for a wonderfully enlightening post.
storm
I'm sorry to hear about this. It is a difficult situation and one that underscores the problems still existing in the world today. Politics and governments are dirty for this very reason - self interest not linked to that of the common folk.
a fabulous post Nicky - well done for bringing it home so eloquently. What to do if one did wake up though?
Heard about the plan to bale out Zim - billionsof usd mooted but from foreign donors and financial institutions...... so who would that be then?
word veri 'chockin' - shocking/choking??
Great post Vanilla!
My apologies for the lack of comments to your replies - but I've been without internet access for the past two days. Thanks for all of them and bear with me while I try to make some general responses to all of you. Not fair, I know but...
I think we all pretty much find ourselves of a like mind on this subject, from whichever angle we choose to look at it.
The one thing that strikes me again and again is our utter failure to learn from history - several of you seem to concur.
The whole China thing seems to open up a can of worms, which no one much seems to like - no doubt as a direct result of China's human rights abuses, not just in Tibet, but in China itself. And yes, one is left wondering why, when faced with the dosh, those in power are happy to turn a blind eye. What does it say about those leaders. Commerce and trade are pivotal to our economies but at what cost, and when and where do we draw the line. Africa, it seems, isn't drawing any lines and that's deeply concerning. And incredibly ironic given the heritage of colonialism. But people can be singularly myopic - the world over, when they're only thinking "me" and "now".
The Dalai Lama issue has been covered globally, it just probably never made front page news and probably never made the news for more than one day. But those who watch know and are constantly watching - there are always guardians, though how effective they are allowed to be is another matter. As Baino said, Avaaz does a pretty good job of watch-dogging.
On the point of shaking the blogging community into action - I think it will be as difficult as shaking humanity per se into action. Yes, there are willing souls out there who want to make a difference and work for change, but there are equally as many, and probably more, who are simply too ensnared in the business of living, or in some cases, perhaps just don't care. One cannot make people change, people have to change themselves. Likewise one cannot wake them up, they have to wake themselves up. Success comes when we all wake up together. The Buddhists, I guess, would call that Enlightenment.
I think Rob, makes a really telling point when he says it's like the SA government has no concern about what citizens or foreign governments think - doesn't this sound frighteningly familiar thinking of the country just north of our borders. But then again, isn't this also true of so many totalitarian systems. And perhaps therein lies a jolly good dose of the truth. And the sad thing is this, despite our constitution, more and more of us fear for the survival of our young democracy already so riddled by corruption and violence. Governments become laws unto themselves and developing world governments seem particularly prone to this "problem".
To Lori, I would say, I think the Arch become saddened a very long time ago when the writing first appeared on the wall.
You know, I think we want to believe the best in human nature because failing to do so leaves us without hope for ourselves and our future, but there simply are certain realities which say that within humanity there is both tremendous capacity for love and generosity and good, but equally there is the same capacity for greed and power and evil - which is driven by the fundamental fear which stems from forgetting our oneness. And I guess until we realise we're all in this together, we're going to carry on making the same mistakes over and over again, as we have throughout our history.
Thanks to all of you for your comments - Lakeviewer, RLB, Gail, Baino, JaneyV, SJW, FireByrd, Lola, Laughing Wolf, Rick, Rambler, Rob, Lori, Lettuce, Miles, Vesper, Karen, Tessa, Storm, Ello, Val and Miladysa - I hope I got you all there!
Well, it is a lame reason but a country has the reason to decide whether she lets someone in or not. For example our President could go to Romania with great troubles for our March 15 commemoration (there are many Hungarians in Romania).
Hey Vanilla-
I've been out of the blogosphere for a while, but would like to invite you to my return party at my blog. :)
"if you dont learn from the past, you are dooomed to repeat it". I used to live in South Africa, part of my heart is still there. This situation is beyond my understanding.I am nto walking in the shoes of the South African people and leaders, however I dont think this decision compliments the histroy of South Africa, the people, the values not even the economy.
I had stopped buying Chinese products years ago - slowly I feel helplessly exposed to Chinese power. Paula
thanks for discussing this.... I always can count on you providing thoughtful and spot-on analysis.....
denying HH a visa to talk at a peace conference is just plum crazy!
Post a Comment