Monday, July 23, 2007

Social Networking, Web 2.0 - and the point is...?

(Image courtesy of the internet and Facebook.)

I've recently been sent a couple of invitations to join Facebook, and given that Facebook seems to be coming up an awful lot in conversation recently, I figured I'd join, have a mooch around, see what was going on. So I have. (Of course this was before I discovered I could never delete my Facebook entry... I can stop using it but not delete it - they say, just in case I want to start using it again...and they get to hold whatever data I've put on their servers...) That aside, I have a fundamental problem with Facebook and similar platforms: I don't get it. Honestly, can someone tell me; what's the point? I'm clearly missing it and seem unable to find it.

I suppose it's a bit like the thing about blogging that I raised a little while ago - about why we blog. Well, okay, I can see the point of blogging and I enjoy it. In my case it's an exercise in writing, sharing ideas and networking - and I suppose many would argue that Facebook offers something similar - especially if you connect your blog to it.

But all this raises a few other things and they're about the very nature of Web 2.0. And, while on one hand I find it really exciting, I'm also left deeply concerned.

In the old days, for those of you old enough to remember pre email... (yes, yes, do pass the zimmerframe, dear), we communicated with each other by letter or by phone - or... in person. Each form of communication, especially the in-person variety was rich in semantics. Now, however, we increasingly communicate via email, messaging, blogging or Facebook/MySpace/Bebo etc - and the richness of semantics is almost entirely, if not entirely, lost. We don't see one another, we don't hear inflections of tone, we miss the wink and yes, thank god, are spared any unfortunate body odour. In other words we miss real human contact. It also means that because the semantic content is lost, we end up having to spend more and more time explaining ourselves. And let's not even talk about the amount of miscommunication or misinterpretation that can and does happen. In the process what opportunity do we have to really get to know one another? Only that which each of us chooses to reveal - and even that may not be real... You only "know" who I am because I say this is who I am. I might indeed, for all you know, be a five foot four alien chicken with a damnable attitude. Or I might be psychopath... You don't really know, do you?

Of course, it's cool to make new connections, as so many of us have done through our blogging - but let's also face it, those connections are generally not particularly deep - we can walk away from one another at any time. There may be a sense of camaraderie, but real, meaningful, honest to god friendship...? Fair enough, some may grow from the beginnings of blog or Facebook connections - but then again, how many friends can any one person actually have?

And here's the other thing I don't get. Kids on campus or in school, spend oodles of time messaging one another via the various platforms. Lecturers and tutors are getting to the point where they're banning laptops in classrooms. What I don't get is the need for this constant connection. They're going to see each other in half an hour in the cafeteria or the next class... - in fact, they may even be sitting right next to one another - and let's face it, just how many notes can you pass during class? So, okay, I'm obviously also missing this point entirely, but perhaps someone can explain it to me.

Then there's this aspect of it all: A friend, travelling on business in a far flung land put away his laptop and went dow to the hotel poolbar for a drink and to find someone with whom he could strike up a conversation - you know, a bit of one on one chat, how's yer father and all that - a bit of real human interaction. He arrived at the poolbar and yes, there were lots of people about - but every one of them had their laptops or handhelds out and they were all tapping away furiously doing their communication with whoever via the ether.

Significant Other had a similar experience: travelling with four colleagues, they decided to go for a coffee whilst waiting for their connecting flight. They sat down and no, didn't start a conversation as one might expect. Instead out came the laptops and handhelds... and tap-tap-tap. Just how sociable is that? Is our social networking going to become more and more bound to a machine? Are we going to have less and less real one on one contact with one another? Let's face it, all this online networking takes time - and that's besides wading through daily mail and other administrative stuff - never mind doing the dishes and making the beds. Here's a question - how much time do you spend with your real "live" friends and how much time do you spend online, chatting, messaging, blogging or whatever it is one does? And how healthy is that?

A psychologist friend told me recently how alarmed she felt when one of her patients told her that he as really proud of how he'd been able to work out a problem with friend. They had, he said, a really deep and meaningful conversation - in a chatroom... My pal said she had to wonder how really meaningful said conversation could have been when neither of the participants could hear, smell, feel or see one another... and the opportunity for misinterpretation was so huge.

Of course, I suppose if you want or have to be housebound, if you're a recluse and hate getting out, then online social networking must be a godsend - but I get the distinct impression that most people networking out in the ether are neither housebound nor reclusive and I have to wonder why we do it... and, in some instances leave ourselves open to being data-mined - or - god forbid, cyberstalked.

Which brings me to the more sinister aspect of it all as espoused in the clip on this site (http://www.albumoftheday.com/facebook/) (sorry, can't get the link to link... hmmm...). The clip came out in 2006 and I do understand that as a result of protests (mosty by students) Facebook are revising their privacy policy. But the cynic in me is left wondering... is the rise of social networking simply an opportunity for Big Brother to peer very closely into our lives.

As alien chicken of my acquaintance said to me, don't be afraid of it, just be very aware, the internet is not a safe place - there are Draconians, in all shapes and sizes, all over the place...

Maybe it's with good reason that I dont' "get" Facebook or MyFace as I indvertantly keep calling it.

20 comments:

Jon M said...

I share your concerns about Facebook and don't really get it. The platform is more like an information gathering one rather than one for 'communication' why do you need to know that I met fred smith at college? who needs to know that unless fred smith turns out to be some kind of terrorist one day and then are they going to come after me cos I went to college with him? Fred Smith is a fictitious character by the way...hang on...who's that at my door? the link doesn't work by the way...spooky? :-)

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

Thanks for the heads up on the link, Jon, very odd... might be because it's javascript or something like that.
You're right, it is more like an information gathering platform isn't it. If you get a chance to take a look at the clip, you'll see why it takes on a really disconcerting aspect re Big Brother (and I don't mean reality tv!)

Verilion said...

I can see where you are coming from here AbVan. In one way e mail and messenger is fantastic for me as I live far away from some of my friends and family and e mails are quicker than letters, but in the end it doesn't replace human contact. I much prefer a phone call or seeing people. But it seems the more technology develops to supposedly help us communicate, the less we are actually able to.

Dewey said...

I can understand with everything you've said and agree with most of it, but I do have to disagree with that psychologist friend. Sometimes people who have something very difficult to work out can have more success via a chat room, email, even a written-with-pen letter, because time is allowed between reactions, and lets people word things more carefully.

Marie said...

i've been hearing about Facebook a lot but I haven't had time to take a look at the site. The thing is, as you said, these things take up so much time. I'm already on MySpace and I have my blog, so I think that's enough for me right now.

Bonnie Jacobs said...

I agree with you, Dewey, that some who cannot face the other can work through things in writing by having time to think about the response.

About that link to http://www.albumoftheday.com/facebook/?

I watched it. Dept. of Defense? CIA? No thanks, I believe I'll stay away from Facebook.

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

I think we have to become increasingly aware V of the potential harm that online social networking can do to real relationships - and also that although we form connections online, they are never the same as knowing someone in person.

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

It's a valid point. But I do think it depends on the people involved Dewey - some people can communicate well and more effectively via a letter or email than they can do via the spoken word - so I would guess it works for some better than others. Trouble is it does also depend on being quite sure where each person is coming from and hoping or believing they will understand the "tones" and intent in an email.

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

I know what you mean, Marie - actually I thought, for some reason, that you did have a Facebook account.

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

Well, yes, Bonnie wish I'd know about those "links" - I'd have stayed away too. Frankly, I feel quite disconcerted about it all.

Wanderlust Scarlett said...

I agree. It's changing the norms of behavior in society, and it isn't always safe.

But it is the wave of the future, and the best way to ride the wave is to teach little ones about both skills; social and technological.

I think that care and prudence, dear prudence, is one of the most important ways that we can protect ourselves, but isn't that true 'in person' as well?

If it makes you feel better, I just got back from a midnight coffee and cakes visit at IHOP'S with a friend who has a crazy schedule. Good conversation, vis a vis... good laughs, good support.
Not gone. Skill at real conversation still alive and well.
But now I'm stuffed with pancakes and french toast and strawberries and it's 1:30 am here, and I have to try to get to bed.

The really big plus to this outing was that the boy wonder waiter did stock me up on single packets of Earl Grey tea, and I didn't have to pinch, only ask.
I'm all set.
At least for a week.

Can't do that online.

Scarlett & Viaggiatore

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

Yep, Scarlett - prudence, awareness, discernment - all very, very important - for adults and children.

And no way can online networking replace pancakes, french toast and strawberries at midnight (oh yes, and sachets of Earl Grey... :-) )

Rambler said...

I guess there are cons for everything, but then these stuff are still new, so people do have the initial curiosity associated with the new techonology, I am a firm believer that chats cannot replace verbal conversations, internet cannot replace books, they just tag along

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

I think you're right, Rambler - nothing will ever replace one to one communication, but we should be aware and make sure that it doesn't. I've seen a friend become completely "addicted" to online living, to the cost of business, friendships etc.

Jude said...

Absolute, I started an account on Facebook primarily because a real live friend of mine had one... but I've not really used it as much as my blog or My space and I agree face to face contact and friends beat all this internet chat...

Brianf said...

The video is a bit scary....but....and there's always a butt.
The connections made are a bit of a stretch. Because someone once worked for a company that once did data mining on people does that make them a big brother clone of big corporate evil that we all want to believe in?
Maybe. There will have to a lot more proof for me. When I set up my facebook account I only thought about reconnecting with an old friend. Since then I have reconnected to a bunch of old friends. I am also not an idiot and I do not use any form of IM nor do I have a web based email address. I have not put my address or phone number on my site or any identifiable information other than my name.
I don't discount the evil side of all this but neither do I subscribe to it. If I did I would have burned my laptop and desktop in my burn barrel after telling everyone I had commited suicide and then moving to the hills and living on groundhogs and wild roots.
Actually come to think of it.....

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

Jude - I think for a lot of us "older" types (zimmerframe, please) we join facebook because we are looking to link up with real live friends, usually those a long way away. My problem is I already have email contact with my friends far away - since most of them are - so I'm not finding that Facebook is adding too much value. Though I'm having a food fight with Minx which is proving to be fun... and have been turned into a zombie by Jon M... ;-)

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

Hey Brianf - I think the bottom line is to be aware and exercise discernment. I think the potential for datamining activity is there for the careless - even identity theft (for those who leave their addresses etc online), but I agree that being paranoid doesn't help. Right, now off to pack my billy can and head for the hills and them wild roots...
;-)

colleen said...

All my friends are non-bloggers who keep me in line if I start falling too deeply into the blog world. They don't read and make me repeat myself. But I definitely need the balance.

Absolute Vanilla (and Atyllah) said...

All my real life friends are non-bloggers, Colleen - and most don't have a clue what blogging is, have never heard of Facebook and are quite certain I'm completely mad. They may be right... :-)